Deception in the Stem-cell Research Debate :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

cunning in the Stem-cell Research Debate The Nobel laureates inaccurate letter to prexy crotch hair urging him to feed federal funds to humankind-embryo ascendent-cell research has had PR cling to in the media. It perpetuates a number of misconceptions and misleading statements regarding husk-cell research, particularly embryonal as opposed to adult stem-cell research, and will serve to continue to cloud the issue. slightly of these deceptive statements atomic number 18 the subject of this essay. I believe President crotch hair and his staff are well aware of the truth virtu aloney embryonic versus adult stem-cell research. Unfortunately, many in the public will read about this letter, recognize some high-profile icons or simply that there are a lot of smart people whove signed on, and think that they know all about this scientific research. Knowledgeable people do not endlessly perpetuate the truth. President Bush and Congress obviously have the last(a) say on how our federal research dollars will be spent. The try for is that all who are participating in this debate are to the full in descriptored about the facts and are not swayed by celebrities who are unluckily ill-informed or deliberately misled, but rather weigh both the scientific and the ethical evidence. There is a lot of misinformation and deception going on in the press accounts of the stem-cell debate. This is probably the worst problem in this on the whole debate, the perpetuation (innocent or not) of misleading statements which obscure many of the real facts. The Nobel laureate letter itself is a prime example of the mixmaster treatment of the facts. What is usually deficient from press reports are a few key adjectives that clarify the smirch - defining whether the cells discussed are human or animal cells, and especially whether they are embryonic or adult stem cells. For example, the letter sent to President Bush says that insulin-secreting cells have normalized blood glucose in diabetic mice. These experiments were done with grownup stem cells from mice, NOT embryonic stem cells. In fact, there are as yet no reports of anyone being able to produce insulin-secreting cells from human embryonic stem cells, but human ADULT stem cells that suppress insulin HAVE been isolated. The letter promulgates the claim (made repeatedly in NIH documents) that adult stem cells do not have the same potential as embryonic stem cells, which in theory can form any tissue. exactly studies done with adult stem cells (studies which mirror the ones done with embryonic stem cells) DO show that adult stem cells have the capacity to form essentially any tissue.