Morality As Anti-Nature Essay

Friedrich Nietzsche, a prominent German philosopher in the 19th century is one of the most well-read philosophers of the knightly two-centuries. His ideas regarding morality and nature continue to be discussed and debated to this day among scholars of all beliefs. either living things be given desires by nature. These desires exist as burst of who we are. They define us in a way they faecal matter promote us and they can also do us great harm. The rudimentary sin of Pride, for instance, can be a good thing, to have superciliousness in yourself and your abilities, and be able to brag about them may be what stands between you and an separate person applying for the same job. But according to the Bible, it is a sin. So the other person might have the moral in high spirits ground, but you will end up with the job. Which is better? Only you can decide that for yourself.Another way to look at it is this. You have a great passion for reading, but morality says that reading is evil. So you abjure yourself the pleasure of a good book, magazine article or flush a street sign in order to follow what somebody else has deemed to be a moral code. You are denying your true self, for no other purpose, but to be accepted in society. In your heart, and in your mind, you agnize that reading is no more evil that breathing, but because society has told you differently, you rebuff reality.To Nietzsche, denying your own passions is like denying reality. If your passions were a tiger, a strong man would acquire the tiger and tame it. A weak man would at least(prenominal) run away. But it is only a fool who pretends that the tiger doesnt exist. The greatest of moralities are those that accomodate nature the weakest of moralities are those that deny it.Even though many people at the epoch truly believed that the church provided them a great direction in life, Nietzsche strongly disagreed. Nietzsche believed that following a godliness is to ignore the very nature of hum anity. He believed that man is born by nature good, proposing that the churchshould not be followed in order for mankind to spare their passions be presented in themselves as they desire. Throughout his writings, Nietzsche aims to inform his readers that we as humans can only reach our potential by following our passions and ignoring the blemish ideals of the church. Under the article of faith of the churchs morality, innate passions of its followers must(prenominal) be abolished in order to become proper Christians. By destroying the intragroup passions of its followers, the church is doing a great disfavor by using morality to rule out nature from their lives.When someone begins to follow the ideals of the church, they are introduced with the doctrine of the idea of free will. Basically, this design claims that even if God is an all right and all powerful being, only his followers have the ultimate office for their actions. As human beings, we have a certain weakness to solve great mistakes. This is where Nietzsche claimed that there is a case of cause and effect. At the time of his writing, Friedrich Nietzsche saw that when events were not proven scientifically, followers of the church were very nave to credit an act of God rather than searching for the answers differently.Christianity had become the opposite of life and nature and the church has stifled its followers by act them into closed minded and weak humans. Nietzsche ultimately believed that religion creates a concept of anti-natural morality which damages our development as humans quite severely, in the end ending our status and rights as individuals once the church gets involved.Nietzsche believed that the church is at war with the passionate and the intelligent in favor of the poor and spirited. He believed that the ones who began the mental and spiritual decapitations of others are truly the ones who were ineffectual to control their passions and were very ill willed. The people of the church who imposed morality as anti-nature were the ones who were unable to impose moderation in their lives. He believed that an immoralist is an ideal human being, because they are the ones who truly understand the rights and wrongs in life by applying passions and a elect lifestyle that best coincides with their lives.