Questions concerning criminal law Essay

i. What atomic number 18 the specific aims & purposes of the whitlow exclusivelyice? To what extent does the barbarous law control behaviour? Do you believe that the law is overly sumptuary or not restrictive enough?The specific aims and purposes of illegal law is to punish criminals, and prevent people from becoming future criminals by using deterrence. Having a criminal justice system that imposes liability and punish ment for violations deter. (Paul H. Robinson, John M. Darley, Does lamentable Law Deter?A Behavioural comprehension Investigation, Oxford Journal of juristic studies, volume 24, No. 2 (2004), pp. 173-205). condemnable law intimidates citizens because most people wont want to be arrested or present a write up on their personalized record. illegal law controls behaviour but only outlines what a good citizen should be doing, by creating laws. More precisely, the term refers to substantive criminal law a body of law that prohibits certain kinds of conduct and imposes sanctions for unlawful behaviour.(The Canadian Encyclopedia, Criminal Law, http//www.the nookyadianencyclopedia.com/articles/criminal-law, para. 1.) Having laws and not enforcing them is point slight, so by creating a law you need to bring down it strictly so people stop committing the offence. Like in Alberta and early(a)wise parts of Canada the Distracted Driving law was in full picture and any angiotensin-converting enzyme caught texting and driving or anything along those lines was given a major demerit dock, and a hefty ticket you need to pay.By doing this it enforces the law and creates that estimate in the back of the citizens head that says should I do that? What will bump if I text and drive and pay back caught?. However, most criminals dont bewilder that subconscious thought and dont c be if they get caught breaking the law, thats why so many criminals are re-offenders. Laws are any questions concerning criminal justice and safetytoo restrictive or n ot restrictive enough depending on where you bide. Some people can be considered criminals in Canada, but be doing family honour killings in their main officeland. Having beauteous much non existent intoxicant addiction develops inEurope to the United States where you get to be 21 is absolutely unreasonable, and depending on where you live your laws can either be too restrictive, like in the US, or not restrictive at all, in Europe.There should be a universal intoxication age of 16, and the driving age should be raised. Allowing teenagers and preteen adults to drive before they learn the effects of drinking is not a good policy. likewise many citizens designate because they deliver been driving for 2 4 geezerhood depend that they can drive wino which is not the case and creates a tumid problem. Among 18 24 year olds, they have the naughtyest percentage in Canada for driving under the influence per 100,000 licensed patrons.Universally, if you lowered the drinking age and heightened the driving age to 21, hopefully less people would be drinking and driving because to a greater extent than than people would have experienced the effect of alcohol before driving. If this actually worked then maybe less and less law officers would need to worry roughly check stops and be less restrictive on certain laws and would be able to focus on other important things around Canada.questions concerning criminal justice and safetyii. assuming that males are more violent than effeminates does that mean that crime has a biologic rather than a social basis (because males & females share a homogeneous environment)?Statistically males made up for more then quint time the amount of crime then females did in 2005. (Women and The Criminal Justice System, http//www.statcan.gc.ca/ taproom/89-503-x/2010001/article/11416-eng.htm.)Males arent biologically programmed to be more corporally raptorial and commit more crimes, but when people say males commit more c rimes because of testosterone, that is crazy because women have testosterone in their bodys too. Males commit more crimes because most males want to assert their macho ness to females and prove that they are manly. When males are 20-25 years old, the mellowest category for committing a crime, they have no other ways to show females how manly they are other then contend and committing crimes.I think the reason why older males dont commit more crimes compared to the younger generation is because older folk have other ways to show their virility like their job, how much specie they have, or the kind of car that they drive. That existence said crime has zip to do with biology, but itcomes down to men trying to show how regnant they are in an attempt to woo a female.Concerning the particular that males and females sacramental manduction the same environment but males being more violent, I think the reason is because males arent as defended as females are. During high inculcat e kids always come across about fathers or brothers who will protect their child or sibling from anyone that hurts them in any way. You never hear a sister or a mother saying that about theirquestions concerning criminal justice and safetyson. (Introduction to Criminology, Lecture 3, September 23, 2013, Professor Jan Stanners.) So another factor about females being less aggressive is the fact that they are protected more and almost restricted from certain things because more people worry about girls then boys. Studies are also display that womens crime rates are increasing quite observably while males are slowly dropping. I think this is because since the 1950-80s womens roles were typically stay at home moms taking care of the children, and so forth But now women have a commode more freedoms and have jobs and can they can now do whatever they please just like males, so I think thats why female crime rates are rising steadily.Also, according to the statscan government website it shows that females have a higher victimization rate between the ages of 18-44, which we expect because men are more violent. However after that age ply the males become the more victimized group which I found real interesting because that in itself refutes any debate of men being more violent because of testosterone, because no matter how old you are your body is comfort producing testosterone.questions concerning criminal justice and safetyiii. Do you agree with the assessment that for young people, a discipline is one of the most wild locations in a community? Did you find your high school to be a heartrending environment?According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, 17 teens were killed at schools and five children killed themselves in the year ending June 30, 2002. (School Safety, http//www.ncpc.org/topics/school-safety.) School can be a very dangerous place for teenagers depending on the area of town that they live in. In Calgary high schools are more safe down siemens then inForrest Lawn just because of the type of families and people there are around influencing the teenagers.The type of influence a teenager gets can return them on the path to becoming a bully. At the Columbine shootings two teenagers shot and killed many innocent teenagers, in Michael Moores documentary it is shown that the two students were bullied from time to time which may have caused them to act out and shoot their peers. (Michael Moore, Bowling For Columbine, 2002.) As far as schools being one of the most dangerous areas in the community I find that hard to believe. Around schools you have teachers and counsellors oversight you and helping you throughout your 3 years so it cant be as dangerous as people make it out to be.However the activities that take place outside of school I think are the most violent ones. They involve students and peers that youve met through high school and I believe people are getting those two things intricate up, but thats just from persona l experience because inside of my high school was relatively safe. We had a lockdown where a student from another school came into ours with a knife looking for a student in one of the classes but the police came and handled the situation accordingly and our teachers were well prepared questions concerning criminal justice and safetyand practiced lockdowns on a regular basis. afterward we all found out this situation happened because of activity outside of school. My personal experiences in high school I never had a physical altercation with anyone but in grades 10 and 11 a lot of students would make organized fights after school and a big push would join. I think this relates to the previous question on men being more violent, because teenagers have no other way to assert their manliness to friends and girls other then to fight and beat someone up. I think the most dangerous places in our rural communities is back alleys at nighttime time walking home from drinking at a friends or at a bar.You make yourself an easy target being drunk and thats when criminals take the chance to mug you. By being at school its really hard to make yourself a big target with teaching staff all around you. To sum everything up I do not agree that schools are the most dangerous place for young people. In some instanced even your own home could be the most dangerous place to be and school could be like an escape for some students.questions concerning criminal justice and safety abduce PageThe Canadian Encyclopedia, Criminal Law, http//www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/articles/criminal-law, para. 1. Michael Moore, Bowling For Columbine, 2002.Paul H. Robinson, John M. Darley, Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioural Science Investigation, Oxford Journal of Legal studies, volume 24, No. 2 (2004), pp. 173-205. School Safety, http//www.ncpc.org/topics/school-safety.Women and The Criminal Justice System, http//www.statcan.gc.ca/ taphouse/89-503-x/2010001/article/11416-eng.htm.